PR Walkthrough
Make every PR understandable, even when AI agents generate hundreds or thousands of lines of code.
Explainability for every diff.
PR Walkthrough explains a pull request before anyone reads a line of it: what changed and why, how the changed files fit together, how behavior shifts, and where the risk is. It arrives as one structured comment at the top of the PR, separate from inline findings, so reviewers spend their time judging the change instead of reconstructing it.
AI-written code looks right. That is the problem.
Coding agents write code that reads well: idiomatic, clearly named, and consistent with the code around it. When it is wrong, the flaw sits in the logic or the structure, not on the surface.
Finding it means reading closely, working out what the change was meant to do, and checking that it really does it. That slow, careful work lands on the engineers who know the system best, and review times show the cost.
- +156.6%Median time to first PR review
- +199.6%Average time spent in code review
- +441.5%Median time in review
Every PR,
understandable.
Large, AI-generated pull requests are where review time goes. PR Walkthrough gives reviewers the context first, so their attention goes to judgment, not reconstruction.
Understand PR Changes at a Glance
Generate an intelligent, structured summary of what changed, why it changed, and how the modified files relate to each other. Help reviewers quickly understand large and complex PRs without reading every line of code.
- PR summaryWhat changed and why
- Changed filesHow they relate
- Review effortEstimated up front
Visualize Code Changes and Execution Flows
Group related changes into logical components and layers. Generate sequence diagrams, dependency graphs, and workflow visualizations to explain how changes affect application behavior and component interactions.
- GroupingComponents and layers
- Sequence diagramsCalls added or moved
- DependenciesGraphs and workflows
Explain Business Impact, Technical Risk, and Blast Radius
Explain how code changes affect services, APIs, dependencies, and downstream components. Highlight potential regressions, security implications, architectural changes, and the specific code responsible for identified risks.
- Blast radiusServices, APIs, callers
- RiskRegressions and security
- ArchitectureLayers and dependencies
Accelerate Reviews with Contextual Explainability
Provide reviewers with change history, linked issue context, implementation rationale, and AI-generated explanations of complex code. Highlight areas requiring deeper investigation and help reviewers make informed approval decisions.
- HistoryRelated PRs
- Issue contextJira and GitHub issues
- FocusWhere to look deeper
How a PR walkthrough works
Generate the overview.
Start at the top of the PR thread with a structured overview, generated during review or on demand. Keep the big picture separate from inline findings.
Choose your team's context.
Enable each section independently. Use custom reviewer rules to bring in the right owners, and review status messages to see when a review cannot proceed.
Validate the linked issue.
Check the change against the issue's requirements using existing linked-issue validation. See what's covered and what still needs attention.
Linked-issue validation docsCommands
PR Walkthrough is shown in preview. Command availability depends on your release.
cloudaeye:pr-walkthrough <pr#>
@cloudaeye /pr_walkthrough
Add tenant-scoped profile lookup
A new profile endpoint authenticates the caller, checks access in the service layer and scopes the database query to the caller's tenant.
Changed files summary
api/profiles.tsservices/profiles.ts
Add the route and enforce the caller's access policy.
API + behaviorrepositories/profiles.tsKeep tenant isolation inside the database query.
Data accesstests/profiles.test.tsCover own-tenant, cross-tenant and anonymous requests.
VerificationSequence diagram
Estimated review effort
3 / 5 Moderate
Focus on authorization and cross-tenant behavior.
Linked issue assessment
Gap to verify
#128 requires isolation. Confirm the test fails without tenant scoping.
Sample assessment: verification needed.
The example includes tenant-scoped queries and isolation tests. Confirm those tests fail when tenant scoping is removed before considering requirement #128 satisfied.
Related issues
#128 Tenant isolation for profile access
Related PRs
#38 Centralize profile authorization
Suggested labels
enhancementapisecurity
Suggested reviewers
@api-owner · @security-owner
Custom reviewer rules
Authentication or access-control changes → security owner.
Review status
Walkthrough ready
Inline findings remain in the code review.
No sections selected.